Sunday, November 30, 2014

PEAR USA:Answering Rev. Daniel Hanlon of PEAR USA About his question: “Why Is Our Relationship with Rwanda Significant?” Published by Watts on 10/7/14


Dear Rev. Daniel Hanlon

First of all I take this opportunity to thank you and acknowledge that work your organization and church is doing in Rwanda. Although I might not agree with everything you do and say about your work in Rwanda, I cannot fail to acknowledge some contributions that your work has done in Rwanda in the last decade. We Rwandans pray that may the Good Lord continue using you in a more positive way to benefit Rwandans both spiritually and physically.

As I was looking for some articles to read about the issue of spirituality and reconciliation in Rwanda after 20 years since the 1994 Rwandan Genocide I came across your article on PEAR USA. I was captured by the heading which says: “Why Is Our Relationship with Rwanda Significant? I started reading your article to make sure I understood you well, especially considering the overwhelming concerns that I have heard from Rwandans from different quarters expressing their views about what your organization does in Rwanda. After reading your reasons why you are involved in Rwanda I decided to sit down and use the same pain to reply to your article with some observations from someone like me who is a Rwanda and understands what is happening in Rwanda.
This is how you started your article. “I live and minister in Kigali, Rwanda within the Anglican Church (PEAR). So the Rwanda connection is absolutely significant, at least to my family. But I also believe our relationship with Rwanda is extremely important for our PEARUSA churches in the following ways:”
·         First, it allows us the necessary proximity to hear Christian voices other than our own. There is much we can learn from those who are different from us. We grow from the challenge of seeing an issue from a different point of view. The church in Rwanda may be able to speak into our lives and situations if we are willing to listen. My own thinking about reconciliation has deepened as I’ve learned from our brothers and sisters who are walking the hard road of healing and forgiveness after the genocide. To see perpetrators and survivors living in community challenges my conceptions of what unity in Christ looks like in practice.

Dear Reverend, you are absolutely right. There is a lot you can learn from each other. As someone who studied Intercultural Communications and missiology, I agree with you that western Christians, especially those from US should take time once in a while and visit other parts of the world and experience another way of worshiping the Lord. It benefits them in two ways, first they come to learn how fortunate they are compared to other people, and two they learn that they are several ways to communion with God through diversity.

However, I would like to differ from your statement that says: “My own thinking about reconciliation has deepened as I’ve learned from our brothers and sisters who are walking the hard road of healing and forgiveness after the genocide. To see perpetrators and survivors living in community challenges my conceptions of what unity in Christ looks like in practice. This sentence is a core to your existence and purpose of you as an individual or your organization as PEAR is in Rwanda. Majority of Rwandans who have been and still are under the oppressive leadership in this country disagrees with your statement. In facts they accuse you of being an instrument of division and favouritism that is judgemental, which is absolutely opposite to what you said you stand for, spreading the good news of the Lord.  PEAR has promoted RPF domination in Rwanda through its projects and fundraising in US. As someone who hails from the Anglican church of Rwanda in Northern Rwanda I understand what I am talking about.

PEAR has been an instrument of humiliation for Hutus who live in this country. Like most Americans, especially those who call themselves Christians have worked so hard to portray all Hutus as genocidaires as you have put it so well in your own sentence that “perpetrators (Hutus) and survivors (Tutsi) living in community work together to promote reconciliation. When you call all Hutus perpetrators in a country where 80% of the youth are Hutus you are continuing to humiliate them so that they will always feel guilty of things they never did. You are telling Tutsis as you have always done in the past that they are innocent people who have nothing to fear therefore they should go to school and come back lead over the so called perpetrators which is an American made connotation to Hutu community in this country. Why am I speaking out now? Because I am tired of an American imperialism in this Rwanda and your hypocrisy. 

When you call Hutus perpetrators you forget that some Tutsis lead by Kagame invaded a sovereign state supported by American church. You ignore that RPF lead by Tutsis came killing people in Byumba and Ruhengeri. You forget that RPF shot down a plane of a legitimate president of Rwanda Habyarimana Juvenal which allowed RPF to engage in a new campaign of an onslaught on Rwandan people in order to take power in Kigali. You forget that it used to be called Rwandan genocide because millions of people from all sides were massacred. You forget that Hutus lost more than 4 million people in the hands of RPF. You forget to watch the BBC Two documentary called Rwanda the untold story where it details what really happened in Rwanda. Most importantly you forget that your organization has been always unfair by sending Tutsi kids to go and study in USA whereas you send Hutu kids for vocational training in the nearby Kenya so that they are intellectually unable to lead and yet they make up more than 80% of the Rwandans. You as Americans would you allow someone to come from outside shoot your president, take over power, and rule over you regardless? If you cannot accept injustice in your own country why do you go supporting injustice in African countries? Start from your own Anglican church here in Rwanda, how many Hutus in leadership positions and yet 80% of your church members are Hutus? Does it mean that Hutus because they are perpetrators as you always refer to them are incapable of leading the church of which they had lead since 1960?
See video of Hutu refugees being killed in Tingi-Tingi DRC

Reconciliation in Rwanda

I hope you are not serious otherwise if the Good Lord exists you will definitely account for your time in Rwanda. You walk in the streets of Kigali, go to offices, come back attend church leadership meetings, go to scholarships meetings, and walk down the streets and look at the armies, then you see all official jobs and business in Rwanda then you stand before God and talk about re-conciliation, with whom?
Would you allow Spanish people in US to take over the same way the Kagame government has taken over everything leaving Hutus nothing but to beg on the streets? Allow me to use my intellectual ability and help you understand what reconciliation would look like in Rwanda:
1.      If Rwandans were reconciled we would see people who have been held in various prisons across the country being able to access justice so that the guilty are sentenced and the innocent are sent home to be with their families. Did you know that majority of the people in jail in Rwanda are Hutu intellectuals and the ones you call perpetrators are free in their villages because they were illiterates therefore they won’t compete for any job or contest any RPF decisions thus they are free people?
2.      If there was any reconciliation in Rwanda we would see justice for all. This means that we would know who killed close to 4 million Hutus and allow Hutus who lost their loved ones to mourn for their as Tutsis have been doing so for their relatives. We would have been told who shot Habyarimanas plane and who killed Karegeya and others.
3.      If there was reconciliation in Rwanda more than 400000 Hutu refugees stuck in DRC for over 20 years would have come back home and have access to healthcare, water, liberty, and education for their children.
4.      If Rwanda knew anything called reconciliation all RPF army would be a Rwandan army where all Rwandan tribes are represented and people would be allowed to identify themselves as God created them that is being a Hutu would not be a crime as you always refer to them as perpetrators.
·         Our sending church hosts a bocce ball tournament to raise money and awareness for Sunrise School in Shyira Diocese. Prayers are offered on Sundays for pastors and parishes by name. Regular trips keep the connection vital. There are many other ways churches and individuals have already participated in the work of the church in Rwanda, yet there is still so much room for involvement. I am glad you mentioned Shyira where I was born and lived until 2010. Were you bothered to ask the people of Shyira what RPF did to them in 1998? Where is my family which was in Vunga? What happened to them? My entire family was killed one by one and I survived because I climbed avocado tree. Who killed our people in Shyira? Did your organization ever bother to ask where the people who used to lead the church of Shyira are now? I am sure many of them are in jail being accused of killing people but if you knew the history of that region there were no Tutsis in the region so we don’t understand how a pastor in Shyira killed a tribe which never existed in the area in the first place. Were you told that Kagame, Nyamwasa, and some American companies had started thinking of planting a tobacco farm the entire of Ruhengeri and Gisenyi because RPF had killed more than a third of the residents of this region and were determined to exterminate all of them? Now you can talk about reconciliation.

·         You talked about Hawaii to the islands of Lake Kivu but you failed to mention one important thing that characterizes the Island of Idjwi or Iwawa. According to the New York Times a newspaper I am sure you appreciate since it is an American one went there and it discovered that 100% of the young boys detained there were Hutus. Please see the documentary here: World: Rwanda's Island Prison:...SEE THE VIDEO BELOW. You as people of Christ interested in peace and reconciliation have you ever questioned your good friends of RPF and a man of the Cross Rucahana why only Hutu kids were taken to IWAWA? Or as you put it RPF took them there as a preparation for heaven?
-

Conclusion
As you and your family continue to participate in this significant relationship in unique ways, and see more individuals and churches catch this vision and enter more deeply into relationship with the church in Rwanda, please remember the following things:1) Rwanda is an occupied land and when people are occupied they always look for ways to liberate themselves and when they do they make sure they crush all the walls of oppression when this happens whether during your own and my own time or not know that we will all account for what God gave us to do and didn’t do it. 2) As you continue being passionate about helping churches and individuals connect with what God is doing in Rwanda, remember that Hutus are not perpetrators and were forced into actions by those who invaded Rwanda, killed two Hutu residents, and killed millions of Hutu in Kibeho and Tingitingi. Remember that all money PEAR fundraises for Rucahana is used to buying weapons to exclude millions of Rwandans from achieving their freedom and self-determination of which America is not happy about and most of American church because you work for your own end not God’s. 3) Remember that reconciliation in Rwanda is a mirage as long as whoever shot the plane is not brought to justice and those who killed millions of Hutus are not bought to books. Remember, God always speak to people in different ways this might be one of them so that you stop siding with people because they have power but speak the Truth because that what Jesus would have done if he was assigned to Rwanda to promote truth and reconciliation. Peace!!!!To feel free to contact me: Dan.J.Hanlon@gmail.com.

REV. AMINADAB NKURIKIYINKA BISERUKA

Speaking Truth to Empower

ENOUGH PROJECT MUST BE PRACTICAL IN ITS RECOMMENDATIONS

ENOUGH PROJECT MUST BE PRACTICAL IN ITS RECOMMENDATIONS:
Have You Ever Wondered Why a US Based Enough Project Organization Is Guided By Hatred Against Hutu Communities In The Great Lakes Region?


Umwali K. Chanelle
Secretary for the Rwandan Youth for Leadership and Democracy  Change (RYLDC)
Rwandan National University, Huye Campus Chapter
Butare-RWANDA


Background

A Rwandan girl who witnessed all the crimes committed in DRC between 1996 and 2004. I take this opportunity to answer the report published by the US-based organization called Enough Project and also take this opportunity to identify flaws in their judgement and research. I will also provide my assessment, opinions, and ideals. After that I will conclude this letter by developing a theoretical framework that I think is practical to ending insecurity and crimes continued being committed against innocent Congolese and the Rwandan Hutu refugees in DRC. I hope that by the end of this letter all stakeholders, especially Enough Project, international community, Rights bodies, UN
peacekeeping mission (MONUSCO), Congolese Government, Kigali government, US government, and the Great Lakes Council on security and peace in the region would have understood that the FDLR issue is not as simple as the Enough Project puts it. If it was as simple then it could have been solved in the last 20 years. As we young people mature as FDLR gets more support from patriotic youth who want nothing else but the truth about what really happened in Kigali in 1990s. As we experience Western democracy the more we want Rwanda to embrace true democracy and embrace all her citizens regardless of their political ideology.

A.    Introduction

To answer the above question one must first of all understand the background of the existence of this organization and why it was created in the first place. Enough Project was created to destabilize the region in order to protect the American interests, which the Clinton administration had established in late 1980s and early 1990s. Those interests that ENOUGH PROJECT is responsible of protecting through smear propaganda machinery and destructive politics include but not limited to:
1.      Making sure the Hima regime in Uganda stay for generation by supporting President Yoweli Museveni at any cost through both military and diplomacy support. This will ensure that the Bantu people of Buganda never rule in Uganda so that the US interests in Southern Such as oil exploitation remains in the hands of American oil companies.
2.      Making sure that the Tutsi regime established in Rwanda by the Clinton administration lives forever through the Tutsi succession so that Paul Kagame and other Tutsis continue to oppress Hutus so that American business companies have enough access to mineral rich Eastern DRC through Rwanda. This is achieved by the ENOUGH PROJECT programs that spread smear campaigns and rumour mongering against the Hutu rebel movement FDLR calling the members of the FDLR mostly as young as 20 years of age to be genocidaires so that they will never attend schools but remain in the bush and die there either of kindnesses or Rwandan military operations.
3.      Making sure that the people of Congo never experience any democratic regime so that the American illegal companies that are illegally mining in Congo continue to make profit whereas women, children, and girls are being raped on daily basis by the Tutsi backed rebels. This will ensure that US interests are safeguarded at the expenses of lives of Hutus and Congolese people.
4.      Making sure that Hutus and Congolese educated people who live in western countries do not have platforms to tell their sides of the story. This will be achieved through the events that ENOUGH PROJECT organizes across America telling lies on what is truly happening in Eastern DRC, Rwanda, Sudan, and Uganda. These meetings organized by the ENOUGH PROJECT would target programs organized by the friends of Congo and other Congolese and Rwandan diaspora programs.
5.      Making sure that there is no Hutu or Congolese scholars who understand better the Great Lakes conflict get a job in international think tank such as the ENOUGH PROJECT because it can hinder their propaganda machinery designed to spread rumours about Hutus and FDLR. Once this is done then there is no balanced voice for the sufferings of the Hutu people found in Rwanda, Burundi, in Masisi, Rutchuru, and Walikali in Congo, and Bufumbira in Western Uganda.
6.      Making sure people who support the dictators in the great Lakes region such as Kagame, Museveni, and Kabila get key positions in the ENOUGH PROJECT so that they can influence research outcome of the organization research and publication desk. This is emphatically put to the recruitment desk to make sure as many Tutsis are recruited in order to be given a platform to spread their lies and continue branding FDLR as a gang of genocidaires and yet as we have seen majority of the people fighting in FDLR have never been to the Rwandan soil are just children who are fighting to have rights to go back to their ancestral home.
7.      Making sure that Rwanda will never have democracy so that there is a never ending chaos in the region to make relevant of the US activities in the region such as the ENOUGH PROJECT which is not after making peace in the region but making sure Hutus are exterminated and neutralized at all the ages so that the Tutsi regime in Rwanda remain in power despite many human rights abuses Kagame has been committing as stated by the Human Rights Watch and other rights organizations across the planet.

B.     The Enough Project Report is a Pure Propaganda Machinery

To achieve this propaganda, we have seen the ENOUGH PROJECT continues publishing non-factual and biased reports such as the one published on Nov 18, 2014 entitled:” How to Dismantle a Deadly Militia: Seven Non-Military Tactics to Help End the FDLR Threat in Congo” of which I am going to delve into it here below so that we can expose the work of Enough project in details. After this article you would have understood that ENOUGH PROJECT is not after the love of Africans but one of those western mechanisms designed to destroy Africans and loot their natural wealth.

The ENOUGH PROJECT report starts stating ways to defeat FDLR saying that it requires “a comprehensive strategy that incorporates both targeted military approaches and more concerted diplomatic action on non-military areas, including high-level diplomacy, economic measures, incentives to increase defections, humanitarian steps, and criminal accountability. In particular, the FDLR’s collaboration with the Congolese army and its economic lifelines must be significantly curtailed. This report sets out key non-military approaches to ending the FDLR’s ability to continue to threaten peace and security in the region. A follow-up report will review military steps necessary to address the FDLR”. Dear ENOUGH PROJECT here are the ways that you have been getting it wrong and if you do not change your approach you will always get it wrong because either you don’t want to hear from other people than President Kagame and Mushikiwabo or you have an agenda you covertly represent that is designed to continue destabilizing the lives of the people of the great lakes region. Here are some important elements that you have outlined and we the people of Rwanda and Congo believe strongly that they are going to fail as they have failed in the last 20 years:
1.      A comprehensive strategy that incorporates both targeted military approaches and more concerted diplomatic action on non-military areas: Allow me to remind you that now most of us are below 30 years of age and have been following up the issues of Rwanda, Enough Project, FDLR, and regional politics all our lives. You have always suggested comprehensive strategies since we were refugees in Kibumba, Mugunga, Kahindo, Nyangezi, and others. One of those strategies was to come and destroy the Rwandan Hutu refugee camps of which you felt that Mr. Kagame was not going to continue lead an empty country. You strategized and came. You gave Kigali bombs and ammunitions to shoot at us. RPF, UPDF, and Kabila killed whoever they could. You took the weak ones back to Rwanda and separated babies from their mothers that are how some of these young boys in FDLR found themselves in the jungle of Congo. By then you were sure that you had solved the Hutu refugees’ problems. However another monster was going to be born out of your calculated strategies designed to keep Paul Kagame in power. All this involved the straggles you mentioned here above which included military concerted efforts from Burundi, Uganda, Congo, and RPF and high level diplomacy when you sent Sadako Ogata, Louise Arbour to the refugee camps in Tingitingi to come and tell our relatives that they must go back to Rwanda or you will let them die in the jungle forest. Indeed most of them died but still some survived that is why we know talk about FDLR. Your strategies then involved the same things you are talking about right now: military concerted efforts and high ranking diplomacy which involved the UNSC to make sure we are branded criminals but we are still alive and live both within and outside Rwanda. Did you win then?
2.      Incentives to increase defections:  here you remind me when we were children in the refugee camps of Kahindo and Katale. You told UNHCR to reduce food ratio for Hutu refugees so that our mothers go hungry and we get Kwashiorkor so that you can force people to go back to Rwanda. It is true many of us suffered from hunger because of your ambitions to support the regime that even the Human Rights Watch, BBC, and UNHRC call a criminal regime. We went hungry and you waited for millions of Rwandan Hutu refugees to go back to Rwanda, but they didn’t. Did you win then?
3.      Humanitarian steps and criminal accountability: Dear ENOUGH PROJECT please doesn’t preach water and take Amarulla. You are talking about humanitarian actions whereas here in DRC we have more than 300,000 refugees including children as young as 0-5 years old. You have never written any report highlighting the plights of these children. You have never talked about immunization of these Hutu refugee children. You have never thought of their future and their lives today. Now you are talking about humanitarianism? For who? Maybe for Banyamurenge refugees of whom you have been keen to advocate for but don’t talk about humanity because we have never seen it throughout your actions. You talk about criminal accountability. You are right M23 killed innocent people in Rutchuru, Kiwanja, Bunagana, and Kibumba. You were there I met your researchers on the ground. They never mentioned the brutality of the M23 because it was an outfit of your henchman Paul Kagame. You have never taken anyone to court. BBC has made it clear that Paul Kagame shot down the Rwandan presidential jet which is, under international criminal law, is a terrorism act which deserve an international concerted judicial effort. What happened to your humanitarian values and rights-defending attitude? I think you should give Hutu people in the region a break if it is suffering in your hands we have suffered enough and we are not going to take it any longer.
4.      To ending the FDLR’s ability to continue to threaten peace and security in the region: Dear ENOUGH PROJECT, when you start talking about ending FDLR’s ability, you forget that FDLR does not need any financial support because it stands an ideology for millions of Rwandans. As you might notice in this letter someone who is writing to you right now is an educated 28 years old Rwandan refugees. In fact FDLR does not know me that I am their supporter but I am. Why? Because they stand for the plights of millions of Rwandan and Congolese people who need peace, stability, freedom, and are tired of western imperialism which come to Africa under the umbrella of bringing peace into the region but what you leave with us Africans is nothing but pieces. Therefore, you can fight a military war but you can never defeat ideology. Because it is about people believes, values, aspirations, identity, definitions, and most importantly, patriotism. Therefore, I wanted to let you that there are more than a million of us out there who are ready to support FDLR psychologically and morally until we set all of us free. You speak of a threat to peace and security in the region. When you visited the region, especially the Eastern DRC did you ever bother to reach out to communities in Masisi who have intermarried with FDLR members? Have you ever noticed that when you sent Kigali to come and bomb these innocent people they don’t run toward RPF or FARDC but to where FDLR is? Once you answer the above questions then you should go back to reframe your strategies because they are more western oriented than “Afrikanism”.
5.      A follow-up report will review military steps necessary to address the FDLR: Before you continue wasting your resources doing things which are not necessary fruitful like writing the SEVEN RECOMMENDATIONS you put here below, let me advice you how to review military steps necessary to address the FDLR ghost: a) Talk to Kigali and let them know that what treated the Compaore syndrome in Burkina Faso is not far away to cure the Rwandan cancer of the “Je suis l’homme fort de Kigali”; b) tell Kagame that Rwanda does not belong to individuals but the people of Rwanda that you have oppressed for the last 20 years and they are taking notes; c) There is only one hope to give people rights to exercise their democratic rights by choosing their own leaders then FDLR can come home peacefully and become valuable Rwandans who contribute to the society; d) ask him to go and learn how Burundians and South Africans sorted out their differences and tell him that is the better way out of this mess before it is too late; e) truth justice, reconciliation, and forgiveness commission that is the only solution to address the FDLR ghost. Once you do this then you can give yourself a credit of being a peacemakers otherwise your biased attitudes towards Hutus and Congolese people has become too much through your reports and so called publications which are source of continued suffering of the people of this region not a solace as your name once suggested.

C.    Enough Project Biased Recommendations

Sorry for taking too long to come to your recommendations. In African culture we don’t say the most important news first unlike the Westerners. We always reserve the important news for the last so that we establish a background of where we are coming from and help you see where our steps are trekking toward. Your recommendations can only be understood if I analysed them one by one and step by step so that you see how unfriendly you are toward two communities in the Great Lakes region which are Hutu and Congolese people in the region. You’re started saying that:
1.      Regional diplomacy. U.N. Special Envoy Said Djinnit should continue to proactively repair relations between Rwanda and South Africa. FDLR existed in tough times when no one wanted to be associated with it. Tanzania expelled Rwandan refugees in 1997 of which some of them had no options but to cross over to DR Congo and join FDLR. These are the same people fighting for their rights today. UN has never liked FDLR because the UN is the sole reason why FDLR exists today anyway. UNSC is among those who helped Kagame to take over Rwanda and you have never allowed Rwandans to enjoy democracy as the one you enjoy in your countries and now you think that your hatred for FDLR will solve Rwandan problems. FDLR has been attached more than 85 times since 1998 to this day and they still get stronger so if you are still looking for ways to murder more than 300000 Rwandan Hutu refugees you have not been able to kill in the last 20 years we are here to let you know that your evil plans against FDLR will never work. They will all fail the same way the ones killed masses of Hutus in Tingi-Tingi never succeeded. In fact continued killing of Hutu refugees in Congo you create more recruitment ground for us to join the fight because we fight for our belonging so we will never wane away.  
2.      Cutting off the FDLR’s economic lifelines: charcoal. U.N. Special Envoy Said Djinnit, U.S. Special Envoy Russ Feingold, and U.N. Special Representative Martin Kobler should press the U.N. peacekeeping mission (MONUSCO) and the Congolese police to support the Virunga park rangers of the Congolese Institute for Nature Conservation (ICCN): Dear ENOUGH PROJECT we would like to let you know that you don’t love this park more than we do. We were born here in Rwanda and we know the names of all animals in this park. We have breathed the fresh air from this park before you could even know it existed. Our grandparents used herbal medicines from this park our mothers sung beautiful songs praising this park before your parents could know that there is something called VIRUNGA. Don’t come to lecture us telling us how we should protect this park. In 1991 RPF was there selling charcoals I was a baby but when I went to school I tried to look for one of your articles whether there was one talking about the RPF illegal logging in the National Park of Virunga but I found none. There are also no significant differences between Mr. Kobler, ENOUGH PROJECT, and Gen. Romeo Dallaire in 1990s. He was an Anti-Hutu as people then and helped to propel RPF to power after the downing of the Presidential jet that was carrying two Hutu presidents Habyarimana Juvenal of Rwandan and Ntaryamira Cyprian of Burundi. The same things Mr. Kobler and Enough Project are doing waging two wars the same the Western media waged the propaganda war against innocent Hutus in 1990s that is the same path that Enough Project that has been treading since its formation to spread propaganda against FDLR in Eastern DRC. As Mr. Romeo Dallaire waged war against innocent Hutus who were defending their independent nation in 1990s that is the same war that Mr. Kobler has been waging now against FDLR and hundreds of thousands of Rwandan Hutu refugees including children, women, and elderly people just simply because they are Hutu according to Mr. Kobler they must die even though their survived the RPF brutality since 1990s now you are ready to launch the last attempt to wide them out of the surface as you did in 1990s and 2000s. However, no weapon formed against innocent children and women will prosper, thus says the Lord. Your propaganda and military campaign will still leave us stronger than you found us. This is Africa and we are here to stay until justice is done for us and people are free from Kagame’s oppression.
3.      Accountability for Congolese army officers. Djinnit, Feingold, Kobler, and Angolan President José Eduardo dos Santos should escalate pressure on the Congolese government to investigate, suspend, and indict Congolese military officers who are suspected of collaborating with the FDLR:The entire system was set up to oppress Hutus and Congolese people since early 1990s. All Congolese know that. Many Rwandophone people are in the Congolese army and they witnessed how their relatives were killed by the Tutsi movement that comprised of Rwanda, Burundi, Uganda, and Banyamurenge. We Congolese witnessed how our people were killed by Kagame’s military campaign. The people of Rwanda origin have been subjected to humiliation and extermination campaign since 1990s. There is no way Congolese officers who have been oppressed this long will ignore the call from FDLR because they know well that their peace and freedom depends of democracy in Rwanda. SO please don’t be naïve look for practical solutions don’t continue going around the same way you did in Somalia and Vietnam. It did not work then it is not going to work on FDLR.
4.      Work to apprehend FDLR leader Sylvestre Mudacumura and encourage public indictments. Djinnit, Feingold, and dos Santos should urge MONUSCO and the Congolese government to cooperate with the International Criminal Court, apprehend Mudacumura, and strengthen the case against him: Dear Enough Project, all your writing is an anti-Hutu propaganda. Mr. Mudacumura did not commit more crimes than Paul Kagame, Kayumba Nyamwasa, Jean-Marie Runiga Lugerero, Sultani Makenga, Laurent Nkunda, and the rest. However, in your previous reports you always mitigated the gravity of the crimes committed by Gen. Ntaganda and a likes simply because they are Tutsis and Mudacumura is a Hutu. The UN Mapping report shows us that Kagame and his cronies killed more than 6 million Rwandans and Congolese in DRC how come you have never written anything regarding the justice of the UN Mapping report? Has Mudacumura committed more crimes than all crimes committed by the mentioned people?
5.      Third-country resettlement. Djinnit, European Union Representative Koen Vervaeke, and Feingold should finalize negotiations with countries outside the Great Lakes region and develop concrete options for resettlement for FDLR combatants who are not indicted for atrocity crimes and who have a fear of return to Rwanda. Such offers should include the protective measures necessary to encourage increased defection: FDLR combatant don’t have to be resettled in another country. They have a home which is called Rwanda have all the rights more than anybody else to go back to Rwanda. Instead of wasting money and resources trying to protect your henchman Kagame FDLR must be given a political space in Rwanda so that all of us the people living in this Rwanda we can be proud of our country and we should not have any more refugees outside of Rwanda. You are insensitive people who always want to avoid the real solutions. What is hard to create a UN corridor to protect the FDLR combatants and their families to go back to Rwanda the same way your helped FPR to go back to Rwanda do the same for FDLR? In fact it will be much easier and less costly for the FDLR people coming back to Rwanda because they have families, relatives, loved ones unlike FPR which was based in Uganda and had no people in this Rwanda but you went ahead and helped them not only to come back to Rwanda but to take over power. FDLR is not asking to take over power is asking to simply allow them participate in the Rwandan politics because they are Rwandans there is no reason they should be taken into exile again. If you want combatants to take into cantonment in the third country please take M23 FROM Uganda and Rwanda and take them wherever you want because they have no place but FDLR has a country which is Rwanda and whether you like it or not they will come back home. They are Rwandans.
6.      Refugees. Djinnit, Feingold, and Kobler should work with the U.N. High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) to set up protected camps for refugees in eastern Congo. The envoys should also ensure that MONUSCO provides security for the camps: I hope FDLR won’t be tricked again and allow its family members and refugees to be put in the refugee camp as this report biasedly put because we all Rwandan Hutu refugees understand what UNHCR did to us in 1996 and in Tingitingi and elsewhere. UNHCR is not an organization that Rwandan Hutu refugees should trust because in 1990s UNHCR assisted RPF to infiltrate into camps and poisoned water, and stocked arms, and gathered intelligence. The result was the destruction of the Rwandan Hutu refugee camps in Eastern DRC. We are not ready to undergo the same horrible experience again. FDLR is composed by Rwandans who want to go home back to Rwanda they want no any kind of support apart from political space in Rwanda. If you loved refugees you should be telling us what is happening to innocent woman by the name Victoire Ingabire who went back home after 15 years in exile and when she arrived she was thrown into jail for 15 years now you are writing about things which have no academic and intellectual basis at all but a mere propaganda designed to continue supporting RPF as you have always done in the past.
7.      Security guarantees. Djinnit, Feingold, and dos Santos should work with Rwanda to provide an improved security plan that is co-signed by international actors and to issue a new statement that would outline more concrete plans for security and non-prosecution guarantees for FDLR combatants not indicted for grave crimes. Rwanda has had a policy to date, but security deals that have been reportedly broken have made FDLR fighters not trust the current arrangements. A new revised program, co-signed by the United Nations and/or the Southern African Development Community (SADC), could help spur more defections from the FDLR: If there is any guarantee that Kigali can give to all Rwandan refugees is to let people exercise their political rights without fear and favor or intimidation. That is the only gift the Western countries, especially America can offer to the people of Rwanda as an apology to the ordeal we Rwandan refugees suffered in the hands of UN.

D.    THEORETICAL AND PRACTICAL FRAMEWORKS TO ADDRESS FDLR ISSUES AND FIND LASTING PEACE AND SECURITY IN THE GREAT LAKES REGION

If international community, humanitarian organizations, rights organizations, and Enough Project are interested in addressing issues that contribute to insecurity in the region they must go back to the history and look at the root causes of this insecurity in the region. They have to be open-minded consultative people who are open to new ideas from new entities because it has been proved that they way of thinking has never bore any tangible results in the region. Welcoming new ideas will bring in various outstanding issues which have either been ignored by the above entities because of their own political and socioeconomic interests they have in the region or have not been thought of because most of the players concerned with peace in the region are foreign to what is happening in the region and have no clues of what really causes people to fight in this region. Once these issues are put together and all elements have been put together to prepare for the resolution of the security issue in the region then people must accept to hear and work on the following with an immediate effects in order to have a lasting peace in the region by:
1.      Going back to the discussions that were facilitated by the San Egidio, which calls for the establishment of democratic institutions in Rwanda so that people are free to participate.
2.      To understand that more than ¾ of the FDLR fighters are below 30 years and are innocent people whose plights should be safeguarded and accorded unconditional rights to go back to their country of origin which is Rwanda
3.      To call for an inter-Rwandan dialogue that discusses political issues that have divided Rwandans for years and be discussed openly so that people are heard equally.
4.      To set up a taskforce that involves UN, International community, and regional bodies to discuss the issue of military and demobilizations that will prepare for the establishment of national forces instead of a political force like the one that characterizes Rwanda today.
5.      Lastly, to establish a Truth, Justice, and Reconciliation commission that will work to write a new constitution that will put in place judicial, healing, and reconciliation mechanisms that will play a bigger role in national reconstruction and healing initiatives.
E.     Conclusion
Without these five elements being tried those who think they understand what could resolve FDLR and security issue in the region should forget about it. FDLR is no longer a small fraction of 6000 fighters but a movement that represent over 80% of Rwandans and has mobilized enough support of younger generation both inside and outside Rwanda. FDLR is here to stay unless its demands which are the demands of most of Rwandans are respected and worked on seriously, the world should be ready for another 20 years of FDLR in the region. FDLR is not any kind of a rebel movement just has no ideology and a following. FDLR has the people who are anxiously counting on it for their freedom, independence, patriotism, nationalism, and belonging. That is what most of the Rwandan people feel when the world FDLR is mentioned. To solve its problems one must be ready to accept the reality.


We address this letter to the following:

ANGOLA

Dr. Rui Fernando Rodrigues Vasco
Information National Director
Ministry of Social Communication
Rua General Roçadas nº 46, Maianga - Luanda, Angola
Tel: + 244 222394193
Cell: + 244 923595580
Fax: + 244 222 430859
Email:rfrvasco@gmail.com; "rvasco v"@yahoo.com.br

BOTSWANA

Ms.Charmaine Revaka
SADC National Media Coordinator
Media Relations Director
Government Communication and Information System (BGCIS)
Office of the President
Private Bag 001
Gaborone
Tel: +267 365 3535
Mobile: +267 7138 9581
Fax: +267 3904017
E-mail: crevaka@gov.bw

DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF CONGO

Mr Andre Joseph Djate Nkoy
Director of Information
Kinshasa
Tel: + 243 815 080 438/243 990 240 161
Email: ankoy_2007@yahoo.fr

LESOTHO

Mr. Abeloang RAMAKHULA
SADC National Media Coordinator
Chief Information Officer
Email: ramakhula.ramakhula@gov.ls
Tel/Fax: (+266) 22327026
Cell: (+266) 63022457

MADAGASCAR (TBC)

To be confirmed.

MALAWI

Gerald Viola
SADC National Media Coordinator
Director of Information
Ministry of Information, Tourism and Civic Education
Private Bag 310
Lilongwe, Malawi
Tel: +265 1 773 233
Fax: +265 1 774 568
Mobile: +265 999 376 227
Email: Viola.Gerald@Yahoo.Com

CC : Chikondi Chimala
Ministry of Information and Civic Education
Private Bag 310,
Lilongwe, Malawi,
Telephone: + 265 1 773 233
Fax : + 265 1 774 568
Mobile: +265 999 551 000
Email: chimalacc@gmail.com

MAURITIUS

Mr. Oodaye Prakash Seebaluck
SADC National Media Coordinator
Senior Information Officer
Government Information Service
Prime Minister’s Office
Level 6, New Government Centre
Port Louis, Mauritius
Tel: + 230 201 1879
Fax: + 230 208 8243
E-mail: oseebaluck@mail.gov.mu

MOZAMBIQUE

Dr. Teofilo Nhampossa
SADC National Media Coordinator
Director of Information and Communication
780, Avenida Francisco Magumbwe
Maputo, Mozambique
Tel: + 258 21 492614
Fax: + 258 21 490209
Cell: (+258) 823263110
Cell: (+258) 843263110
Email: teofilonhampossa@yahoo.com; tgeofilo.nhamposas@gabinfo.gov.mz

NAMIBIA

Ms Kaleni Hiyalwa
SADC National Media Coordinator
Ministry of Communication & Information Technology
Private Bag
Namibia, Windhoek
Tel: + 264 61 283 2670
Cell: +264 8132 96479
Email: khiyalwa@gmail.com;

SEYCHELLES

Mr. Andre Butler Payette
SADC National Media Coordinator
Press Attaché
Ministry of Foreign Affairs
Republic of Seychelles
Tel.: + 248) 4243646
Fax:
Email: apayette@mfa.gov.sc
CC: apayette@gov.sc

SOUTH AFRICA

Ms Bongiwe Gambu
SADC National Media Coordinator
Director: International and Media Liaison
Government Communications
Cnr Vermeulen & Prinsloo
Midtown Building
Pretoria, South Africa
Tel: +27 12 314 2148
Cell: +27 82 714 9463
Email: bongiwe@gcis.gov.za

SWAZILAND

Mr Martin Dlamini
SADC National Media Coordinator
Director, Information, Media Development
Ministry of Information, Communications & Technology
Inter-Ministerial Building #8
Level 3 Mhlambanyatsi Road
P O Box 642
Mbabane, Swaziland
Tel: +268 2404-4000
Fax: +268 2404 0651
Cell: +268 7606 3712
Email: dlaminimart@gov.sz

TANZANIA

Mr. Raphael H. Hokororo
SADC National Media Coordinator
Assistant Director
Ministry of Information, Youth, Culture and Sports
P O Box 8031
Dar Es Salaam, Tanzania
Tel:     +255 22 2125180 / +255 22 2125181
Cell.:  +255 754478166 / +255 715478166
Fax:    +255 22 2126834
E-mail:   raphael.hokororo@habari.go.tz

ZAMBIA

Mr. Innocent Mwape
SADC National Media Coordinator
Senior Press and Public Relations Officer
Acting SADC National Media Coordinator
Ministry of Information & Broadcasting
Government Complex
Independence Avenue
P O Box 51025
Lusaka, Zambia
Tel: + 2601 237167
Fax: + 2601 235410
Cell: +260976780223
E-mail: mwapeinnocent@yahoo.co.uk

ZIMBABWE

Dr Ivanhoe Matengarufu Gurira
SADC National Media Coordinator
Principal Press Secretary
Ministry of Information & Publicity
P O Box CY1276
Causeway, Harare
Tel: +263 4 764088 (dir) / +263 4 793891-4 (op)
Cell: +263 712867333

Email: commint09@gmail.com; igurira@information.gov.zw; gurira@mail.ru