By EMMANUEL NERETSE
On the eve
of the commémoration the 20th anniversary of the genocide in Kigali, the
Rwandan President General Paul Kagame has recurred in his invectives which he
has the secret against the France and Belgium.
 |
| MR. KAGAME |
In an
interview with the weekly Jeune Afrique Paris, Rwandan President has indeed
accused both countries including France have taken an active part in the 1994
genocide. Immediately
disseminated information, the France canceled its participation in the ceremonies
in which it was to be represented by the Minister of Justice and Attorney
Christiane Taubira where it might be publicly humiliated despite his known
sympathy for the regime of Paul Kagame.Belgium meanwhile preferred to go. So Paul Kagame remains constant with
himself because he has always enjoyed an indulgence outsized share of these
powers to blackmail when he wants.
Born in
impunity
When the
Tutsi elements of the regular army of Uganda where Kagame was a senior officer
invaded Rwanda in October 1990, the Western powers not only did not condemn
this aggression that violated the Charters of the UN and OAU, but some have
adopted ambiguous attitudes, unfriendly or even hostile to Rwanda.Thus, Belgium
at the time closely linked to Rwanda will declare an embargo of arms against
the government in place, France meanwhile, urge the regime of President
Habyarimana to open a new front, political one, by introducing multiparty
during the war, which was suicidal. As
the Anglo-Saxon powers, they supported the attackers by their Ugandan foal
interposed. And "politically
born" Paul Kagame in a context of impunity and compromises of the
international community. It will
grow in this atmosphere, and will benefit from it.
A proxy
war
The course
of the war of conquest of Rwanda (1990-1994) appears as a deliberate war and
led by these powers with as visible actors Paul Kagame and his RPF. The Belgian capital, Brussels, became
de facto the European headquarters of the RPF, with all the official press at
his disposal. La France
"advised" to his ally to negotiate with the invader from Uganda
magically become "an internal rebellion." On the ground, the war crimes that
were committed conquerors obscured if they were not placed on the back of
government attacked. Thousands of
displaced Byumba and Ruhengeri prefectures border with Uganda, the RPF Kagame
had driven from their lands were ignored or presented as Hutu extremists.All
that Paul Kagame noted and would make a thread of its attitude towards those
powers once in power.
After the
signing of the Arusha Peace, there was talk of a UN force (UNAMIR) that would
help the implementation of these agreements. Belgium
should provide the largest contingent. Unfortunately,
these brave soldiers were badly briefed before they are sent to Rwanda. They landed in Kigali effect with
their head in front of them have a good side (RPF) and the other evil
(government forces) and therefore it was their moral duty to do everything to
help good! Subsequently we know
it. France concerning it had been
requested by the RPF to repatriate its last soldier of Rwanda before the
signing and especially not to be part of the UN force. Paul Kagame just noted and will make
use of later.
Politically
incorrect to denounce the crimes of Paul Kagame
After
taking power in July 1994, it became taboo by the same international community
to discuss the crimes that indulged the new regime in Kigali by him. Even the most spectacular mass crimes
such as the massacre at Kibeho, or executions by grenades and machine gun fire
on the crowds gathered in stadiums for meetings traps were not convicted of
fear not to offend the dictator on the rise . He
noted this and would use it in its relations with these powers. The dismantling of refugee camps in
eastern DRC who was accompanied by thousands of dead and hunting Hutu in the
Congolese jungle that made millions of deaths both Rwandan and Congolese will
not move the same powers more . Kagame
will take note.
The
international court discredited
In 1994,
the Security Council of the United Nations set up an International Criminal
Tribunal for Rwanda to try crimes committed in Rwanda and neighboring countries
from 01 January to 31 December 1994. From
the beginning of its work, the observers were surprised to hear that the attack
of 06 April 1994 that killed the Rwandan President Juvenal Habyarimana and his
Burundian counterpart Cyprien Ntaryamira was not within the scope of its
investigations. Yet this attack
was the trigger for the massacres and genocide that had the same ICTR judge. Paul Kagame, the sponsor of the attack
having learned the lesson of how to deal with the international community, had
served on the court by the voice of his American masters, he was not about to
investigate the attack. The
Australian investigator Michael Hourigan will pay the price. Later, when the Prosecutor Carla Del
Ponte want criminal charge within the RPF, Kagame will tap on the table and it
will be sacked and replaced by the Gambian Hassan Boubacar Jallow much more
realistic and cooperative with the regime of Paul Kagame.
Even the
French justice march in tune with Paul Kagame
The ICTR
has refused to hear the case of the attack of 6 April 1994, the families of the
French crew who perished in the attack went to court in their country so that
it identifies the authors so that they are punished. In 2006, nine arrest warrants were
issued by the jugeanti terrorism Bruguiere against relatives of Paul Kagame. In response Kagame break off
diplomatic relations with Paris. It
was not until the arrival at the Quai d'Orsay Bernard Kouchner great friend and
admirer of Paul Kagame to restore these relations after the comedy
"arrest" on the advice of Foreign Minister Kouchner, Rose Kabuye one
accused persons. Meanwhile, the
case was assigned to a new judge, Marc Trévidic, who was summoned to start over
investigations in the direction of at least exonerate Paul Kagame or if
possible to put this crime on the backs of "Hutu extremists"
designated scapegoats.
Wanting to
silence criticism of its predecessor which had not visited the scene of the
attack, the judge Trévidic his team went to Rwanda accompanied by ballistics
experts and surveyors. The report
ballistic experts and surveyors about the place of departure missiles tended to
designate the Masaka hill as was said several witnesses, as if by magic, the
judge had to resort to a "deus ex machina" acoustician who n 'is not
go to Rwanda, have made a simulation from a shooting at a military base in the
center of France and concluded that the missiles were parties Kanombe military
camp then held by the Rwandan Armed Forces ( FAR). It does not faillait more for
defenders Kigali shout victory and relayed by the press to pay Paul Kagame very
powerful in France, now claim to hold "the" evidence that Habyarimana
was killed by his own. They did
not hesitate to ask the judge to impose immediately Trévidic a
"non-place" in favor of their clients. However, the judge still hesitates and
does not run, so trickery and fumigation are enormous. As is required by the professor
Bernard Lugan, how could he give a non-place?:
1)
How Trévidic judge could he do otherwise than refuse not place with a record
giving, among other things, instead of firing missiles, the names of two
shooters and members of their escort, brand and color vehi cles used to transport missiles from
Uganda to the barracks of the RPA in the center of Kigali and thence to the
place of shooting through the lines of the Rwandan army and the place of
action?
2) How the
investigator could he make a place not when the file contains evidence that the
Rwandan president's plane was hired by two missiles traceability has been
established? Through cooperation
judiciaire Russia it is known that these two missiles whose serial numbers were
04-87-04814 and 04-87-04835 respectively were part of a batch of 40 IGLA
missiles SA 16 delivered to the Army ougandcomfortable few years ago. However, Paul Kagame and his top aides
were senior officers in the Ugandan army before the Rwandan civil war, and from
1990 to 1994, Uganda was the rear base, but also the arsenal of the RPF.
3)
How can a non-place could he be considered when, before the ICTR, there was
ample evidence that the Rwandan army had no such missiles and that the murder
weapon was however in the hands of the RPF?
4) How
Trévidic judge could he satisfy the exorbitant demand for non-place when he
knows that the same Rwandan army, paralyzed by the arms embargo and the
sequestration by the UN of its heavy weapons and helicopters, was not able to
fight and that it was the RPF unilaterally resumed hostilities because he knew
he would win the war?
5) How t el no place could it be justified
when, as was amply demonstrated by the ICTR, the RPF forces that are waiting
for a signal to launch their offensive long prepared, received the for operation
from bases the Ugandan border on the night of 6 to 7 April, just after the
announcement of the death of President Habyarimana? "The blog Debernard Lugan,
03/04/2014
Unfortunately,
the source close to the case we learn that Trévidic judge at the end of breath,
especially since the arrival of Christiane Taubira the Ministry of Justice and
therefore having under his orders the prosecutor should deign to transmit to
the Court of seated in case of confirmation of charges, which in the current
state is not obvious. It will
therefore throw in the towel, saying he was unable to identify the perpetrators
of the attack and thus give a non-place for close to Paul Kagame but also do
not designate as "Hutu extremists" allegedly committed this attack. Again blackmail Paul Kagame to the
Western powers will market.
In
conclusion we can say that the creature Kagame has noted that its creators
never dared reprimand for his sins in the manner of a prodigal son. Now an adult, he can taunt without
fear of reprisal because he holds hostage for years. On this point he is more consistent in
this fool's game. transmitter the
Court of Assizes in case of confirmation, which in the current state is not
obvious. It will therefore throw
in the towel, saying he was unable to identify the perpetrators of the attack
and thus give a non-place for close to Paul Kagame but also do not designate as
"Hutu extremists" allegedly committed this attack.Again blackmail
Paul Kagame to the Western powers will market.
Brussels,
07/04/2014
Emmanuel Neretse
Emmanuel Neretse
No comments:
Post a Comment